REFERENCES
References
-
Z Kornberg, E Shkolyar, TJ Lee, JC Liao. Initial Clinical Experience of a High-Definition Single-Use Flexible Cystoscope. EUS 2023 Poster
-
Geldmaker LE, Baird BA, Lyon TD, Regele EJ, Wajswol EJ, Pathak RA, Petrou SP, Haehn DA, Gajarawala NM, Ball CT, Broderick GA, Thiel DD. Conversion to Disposable Cystoscopes Decreased Post-procedure Encounters and Infections Compared to Reusable Cystoscopes. Urol Pract. 2023 Jul;10(4):312-317. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000410. Epub 2023 May 25. PMID: 37228224.
-
Seyam, R.M., Zeitouni, O.M., Alsibai, T.M. et al. The grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope is comparable to the reusable, flexible cystoscope for the detection of bladder cancer. Sci Rep 10, 13495 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70424-0
-
McGill JJ, Schaeffer AJ, Gonzalez CM. Durability of flexible cystoscopes in the outpatient setting. Urology. 2013 May;81(5):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.029. Epub 2013 Mar 13. PMID: 23490525.
-
Kenigsberg AP, Gold S, Grant L, Lotan Y. The Economics of Cystoscopy: A Microcost Analysis. Urology. 2021 Nov;157:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 May 16. PMID: 34010677.
-
Legemate JD, Kamphuis GM, Freund JE, Baard J, Oussoren HW, Spijkerman IJB, de la Rosette JJMCH. Pre-Use Ureteroscope Contamination after High Level Disinfection: Reprocessing Effectiveness and the Relation with Cumulative Ureteroscope Use. J Urol. 2019 Jun;201(6):1144-1151. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000108. PMID: 30707130.
-
Assmus MA, Krambeck AE, Lee MS, Agarwal DK, Mellon M, Rivera ME, Large T. Cost-Effectiveness of 90-day Single-use Flexible Cystoscope Trial: Single Center Micro-Costing Analysis and User Satisfaction. Urology. 2022 Sep;167:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.05.039. Epub 2022 Jun 28. PMID: 35772484.
-
Su ZT, Huang MM, Matlaga BR, Hutfless S, Koo K. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes. World J Urol. 2021 Nov;39(11):4275-4281. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03724-3. Epub 2021 May 21. PMID: 34019137.
-
Young JA, Garden EB, Al-Alao O, Deoraj D, Small AC, Hruby G, Grotas AB, Palese MA. Disposable versus Reusable Cystoscopes: A Micro-Costing Value Analysis in High-Volume and Low-Volume Urology Practices. Urol Pract. 2021 Jul;8(4):466-471. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000236. Epub 2021 Apr 16. PMID: 37145468.
-
Hogan D, Rauf H, Kinnear N, Hennessey DB. The Carbon Footprint of Single-Use Flexible Cystoscopes Compared with Reusable Cystoscopes. J Endourol. 2022 Nov;36(11):1460-1464. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0891. Epub 2022 Jun 13. PMID: 35607858.
-
Baboudjian M, Pradere B, Martin N, Gondran-Tellier B, Angerri O, Boucheron T, Bastide C, Emiliani E, Misrai V, Breda A, Lechevallier E. Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Cystoscopes: A Path to Greener Urological Procedures. Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Jul;9(4):681-687. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 20. PMID: 36543725.
-
Boucheron T, Lechevallier E, Gondran-Tellier B, Michel F, Bastide C, Martin N, Baboudjian M. Cost and Environmental Impact of Disposable Flexible Cystoscopes Compared to Reusable Devices. J Endourol. 2022 Oct;36(10):1317-1321. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0201. Epub 2022 Jun 29. PMID: 35703325.